Following participants accomplished imagining a refreshing otherwise terrible existence, we demonstrated him or her a photo out of an appealing people of opposite gender
We performed a pilot study to examine the effectiveness of the money prime before the experiment. The feeling of having relatively more or less money was triggered by asking participant to imagine being in a rich or poor situation and filling in some blanks to complete a story. Specifically, 56 participants (17 men, 37 women) were randomly assigned to two manipulations. In the relatively wealthy condition, participants were asked to imagine how they would live a luxurious life after winning the lottery; they completed sentences such as “I bought myself.” Participants in the relatively poor condition were asked to imagine how they would live a miserable life after losing a huge sum of money; they completed sentences such as “First, about food.” To determine the effectiveness of this money priming technique, participants were asked to rate how relatively wealthy they felt on a 9-point Likert scale. Result of a t-test showed that participants in the relatively wealthy condition (M = 4.83, SD = 1.56) did feel relatively wealthier than those in the relatively poor condition [M = 4.04, SD = 1.25; t(54) = 2.09, p = 0.042, Cohen’s d = 0.56]. This suggests that the money priming method is valid.
Through to arrival https://datingranking.net/pl/mature-quality-singles-recenzja/ on research, they certainly were told that try contains an innovation attempt and you may a study linked to social feeling looking to generate an excellent review ranging from a viewpoint shaped from the looking at a photo and an opinion shaped because of the a face-to-face communication. The fresh new arrangement out of a face-to-deal with correspondence was utilized and come up with members believe that there was a way to come upon an attractive member of the exact opposite intercourse, but it did not in fact happen.
Through to the experiment, we asked 10 boys and you may 10 ladies so you’re able to speed four photographs of an attractive individual of your own opposite sex toward a great 9-section Likert scale (1 = completely unattractive, nine = very glamorous)
We then selected the two photos (one male, one female) that received the highest attractiveness ratings with the least variance (Mmale = 6.92 SD = 0.90; Mfemale = 7.22, SD = 1.30). Participants were told to evaluate this opposite-sex individual by his/her photograph and that they would then have a 3-min face-to-face conversation with him/her. After the evaluation, participants were led to the next room, which had a long desk and six chairs. For half of the participants, a bag, a coat, and a book occupied the position closest to the door at one end of the group of chairs, while for the other half of the participants, these items were placed at the position furthest from the door at the other end of the group of chairs. Thus, we controlled for the influence of distance from this position to the door on the participants’ choices. Participants were told that the person they would be talking to had been sitting on the seat with the items and would come back soon. They were asked to take a seat and wait for a moment. They had five choices of chair (from 1 = “closest to” to 5 = “furthest from” this fictitious other’s seat). Their chair choice represented their chosen distance from the attractive alternative. When they sat down, the experimenter recorded their choice and gave them the PANAS Scale (Watson et al., 1988) to complete.
We up coming assessed whether the participants was in fact suspicious of one’s safety story. Around three players were taken off listed here analyses due to their suspicions. Finally, we debriefed the participants.