On result of this study, ideas can be produced for additional strategies connected with conflict quality. During the relevant literature, fundamentally public ability degree (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), communications and you can troubleshooting degree (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Much time Adams, 2001) and you will behavioural means (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Electricity, 1992) were chosen for training of disagreement resolution. However, cognitive behavioural medication had been effective in ent away from disagreement solution knowledge (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). So it initiatives contributes that people can obtain significantly more pleasure using their relations.
You will find some limits hence influence generalization ones overall performance. Earliest, the research are restricted quantity of new member and you can sample was hired regarding college students. For this reason, the latest samplecan not represent the teenage. Next, parents-teens affairs was tested by using self-report methods and you can anly out of adolescents’ angle. This steps can give limited information regarding relations. Third, individuals’ feeling throughout the relatives is actually looked at particular duration of communications, perhaps not along the period.
Future knowledge is simulate today’s study together with decide to try out-of individuals of individuals age and you will society. Morever, moms and dads kids affairs are assessed using different methods for example videotaped otherwise lead observance. Observational studies you will definitely give more details in the particularly family relations and you may parents’ perception regarding family can be considered in next studies. This research can be regular in a number of menstruation from inside the an effective longitudinal study that could bring way more reasonable abilities.
Addis, J. Bernard, M. Age. (2002). Marital improvement and you will unreasonable beliefs. Log away from Rational emotive and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, 20, 3-thirteen.
Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the analysis away from legitimacy of accuracy out of Argument Quality Level). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, sixteen,7-thirteen
Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential effects of gestalt a few-settee intervention and you may problem solving within the solving desicional dispute. Journal regarding Counseling Psychology, 33,11-15.
Subsequent emotional intervention centered on cognitive choices concept will be applied to individuals to become focus on its with dysfunctional relationship philosophy and its particular adverse effects on the disagreement resolution techniques and change its impaired opinions
Cramer, D. (2004). Effect of the latest malicious beliefs disgareement values for the relationships pleasure having aromantic spouse or closest friend. Psychology and you will Therapy, 77, 121-133.
Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Forecasts dyadic changes out-of general and relationship particular opinions. Log regarding Psychology, 130, 263-280.
DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatments for parent-adolescent conflict due to behavioral techonology studies: example. Journal off Instructional Psychological Visit, step 3,281-301.
DiGuiseppe, Roentgen. Zee, C. (1986). A mental emotive principle out-of relationship dysfunction and you may marital cures. Log off Rational emotive and you can Intellectual Behavioral Medication, 4, 22-37.
Impractical values out-of systematic partners: Their relationship to criterion, requires and you will satisfaction
Eidelson, R. J. Epstein, N. (1982). Knowledge and you may relationships maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional dating opinions. Record from Asking and you will Scientific Mindset, 50, 715-720.
Emmelkamp, P. Grams., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). The newest investigations regarding dating values during the relationship context. Identification and you can Private Distinctions, 8, 775-780.
Epstein, N., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A good. (1993). Therapy of relationship dispute: a cognitive behavioural approach. Clinical Therapy Opinion, 13, 45-57.
Epstein, Letter., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Irrational beliefs and you will feeling out-of relationship conflict. Journal away from Consulting and you may Systematic Mindset, 47, 608-610.
Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The brand new character from cognitive appraisal in the worry about-accounts off marital interaction. Conclusion Procedures, 18, 51-69.
Eryuksel, An excellent. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin situation cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The analysis away from www.datingranking.net/nl/bgclive-overzicht/ family loved ones with regards to troubleshooting, communications feel, intellectual deformation and you will relatives build). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished learn thesis) Ege Univeristesi.